Sunday, May 26, 2013

Eyes on the SIM: What's new in May? (by Mirjam)

Ellaeric, Tolya and Mirjam have been busy on the D/s Academy SIM to put out new surprises for You. Lovely things to see, adventurous things to explore, fun things to play with and erotic things for excitement. You are invited to come to Respect and explore, and if You like, bring friends! Especially the brandnew Aztec Pyramid Labyrinth Dungeon Adventure should be fun with several people. More to come!

Entrance to Adventure - on top of the Aztec Pyramid

Summer is coming - beach area behind the temple

Time for romance - boat on the river

Time to explore - paddle the SIM waters with a canoe

Leisure time - play games with friends

Lovely looks - plants around the theatre

Curious visitors - deer at the House of Scrolls

Relaxation - beach area II next to the theatre

Always welcome - information at the Welcome Pavillion

Lots of fun - the Sparkle game challenge

Erotic fantasy - art exposition at the temple

Enjoy life - tropical greens

Thursday, May 23, 2013

The Healthy Submissive (by Mirjam)

This is the seventh essay of my series about "Internal Enslavement". This time I picked the subject "The Healthy Submissive". Most of what i am going to present here was inspired by an essay of a submissive with the nickname Yaldahtovh that was published on the website http://www.enslavement.org.uk. This website provides many interesting essays, a huge part of them was written by Master Tanos who runs a poly D/s household in the UK. 


0. Introduction

The concept of "Internal Enslavement" deals with the question if a radical consensual slavery is possible in an M/s context that is based on the pillars of safety, sanity, consensual and mutual trust, respect and commitment, in the physical, emotional and mental area of relationship.  According to Tanos the answer is yes. Radical consensual slavery is possible (-> TPE = Total Power Exchange). It is a goal you can work towards to step by step, and you can make more and more achievements towards this goal. This process of a submissive step by step becoming slave and owned possession of her Master, is called enslavement.

Tanos also believes that there are certain techniques derived from psychological knowledge that help with the "examination of a female slave's thoughts, emotions and past experiences to establish and maintain a solid and inescapable state of ownership".  As the focus is on the mental and emotional condition and development inside of the submissive, they speak of "internal" enslavement.  When the authors of the IE website speak of a "natural slave" they mean someone who is a slave by nature ... someone who has an innate or inborn character trait which predisposes them to slavery in some way. This means that while some people are said to be predisposed to feeling comfortable under conditions of consentual slavery in D/s context, others are not. So not every submissive is going to feel comfortable and "at home" in a Master-slave-relationship.

To feel comfortable and "at home" in a Master-slave-relationship. There we have an important component of health - the emotional wellbeing.  The principle of "Safe sane and consentual" BDSM postulates care for the health, the sanity of the partner(s). This does not only comprise the physical health, but also the psychological and emotional health. Body, mind and emotion are to be prevented from harm by words and activities in BDSM context, and the welfare, fulfillment of needs and enjoyment of the partners involved is a goal for many people endulging in BDSM related activities. 


1. "I have these submissive needs - Am I sick?"

Some women who are newly aware of their submissive needs endure a period of self doubt around the troubling question: Am I sick? Yaldahtovh who composed the essay "The Healthy Submissive" that was published on the Internal Enslavemet website writes: "After reading the psychiatric diagnostic manual (DSM-IV) some might wonder if they maybe have borderline personality disorder".   Why? ... People with borderline personality are known to be overly dependant on relationships and can be extremely emotional, and some submissives might identifiy with these two single traits picked out of the wide spectrum that would make up a borderline personality. Another example could be the question of a submissive if she is codependent. There are various examples of self doubt of a submissive who might think she is "not normal" .. "not mentally healthy", being faced with her needs and with what is fun to her.

Yaldahtovh does not only relate to the sexual aspects: "Am I sick because I get turned on by images of being taken, used, forced, swept away by masculine energy more powerful than my own?" She also relates to the nonsexual aspects of being submissive: "Am I sick because I yearn to depend on, and follow the lead of, a man stronger than myself?" Let us further think about these two aspects. What might induce a submissive woman to ask herself if she is probably sick, judging the "language of her nature" (expression by Yaldahtovh) as mental disorder? Society's general attitudes might come to mind. The feminist movement. The values of personal freedom, independency and strength ...


2. A path to self-acceptance

Self-acceptance with all that belongs to self, which might include submissive needs, is important for emotional welfare. A person that does not feel complete, a person that cannot integrate all that belongs to him/her into her self image, might not manage to remain healthy and happy. Yaldatovh sees the field of relationship as primary source of help for a submissive who is struggling with self acceptance:  "A submissive discovers, or more properly, realizes and acknowledges that she functions at her best in relation to another. And the more intimate, holding, containing that relationship, the better she feels and the better she performs in cardinal areas of adult life: work, friendships, and parenting. " I guess most if not all of you would agree on this typical experience of a submissive who is happy in a relationship with a responsible Dominant. So far so good. But tthe submissive might then start to mentally process this experience. "Realizing she is at her best in such relation makes her wonder why she can't do it for herself? Why does she need such a relationship to accomplish what she should be able to do for herself?" And again, the cultural priming, or if You want, Freud's superego, begins to play a role again: It is good to be independent, why am I desiring to be under a Dominant's control? Yaldahtovh describes it so nicely: "pull yourself up by the bootstraps", on the lone pioneer, the trailblazer, the less needy and more self sufficient".

Every submissive has internalized voices of her culture inside, same as the Dominants have. It is a task for a newly aware submissive to separate her BEING/Self from the internalized voices of her culture. Well, and isn't it a task for every adolescent? Isn't this how moral development normally goes? Voices that might say: "You are too needy, too dependent, too focused on the others in Your life". When the sub can identify such voices inside of her, she can also bring herself in some distance to them and measure for herself which one she wants to accept as being in line with her true being and which one's she might judge as non productive for self actualization and personal happiness.

Yaldatovh draws as conclusion: "We tend to ask the wrong questions: 'Am I bad, sick, weak?', when we should be asking,  'is there something missing from the yardstick I use to measure myself?'" With a short and narrow-minded yardstick, they could miss, for example, that society also very much appreciates behavior of people who put needs of others higher than their own, up to self neglectance.  And yes, finding a healthy balance is not easy sometimes. And it is a task noone will take off Your shoulders. When relatedness is seen as strength, it becomes clear that submissives have a special talent for this.It is a matter of perspective. A sub can decide which perspective to take on herself ... and she can learn to take different perspectives , and her Dominant might assist her with this. "If we begin our analysis without the cultural assumptions about what is of "higher" value, we can begin to understand that it is possible for a woman to be submissive, and to be healthy. And we can try to imagine what a healthy submissive functions like, and how she developed her adult personality. " (Yaldahtovh)


3. The Healthy Submissive

In the following You will find a list of 14 traits of a "healthy submissive", as Yaldahtovh presented them in her essay on the Internal Enslavement website. Please use them as inspiration, wrap Your mind around them and critically reflect.

"1. The healthy submissive is capable of, and thrives on, intense, intimate, emotionally open relationships. This is often evident in the number of nourishing, sustaining, and life affirming friendships she makes over the years."

"2. The healthy submissive is a giver. She often needs help to ration herself because her impulses nearly always lead her to want to do good for others."

"3. The healthy submissive is capable of intense joy, especially in the context of a sustaining relationship."

"4. The healthy submissive finds significant relaxation when properly related. She is at ease in that place."

"5. The healthy submissive has finely tuned interpersonal sensitivity. She is reactive to subtle shifts in the emotional tone of others."

"6. The healthy submissive has a fluidity of self, a flexibility that enables her to adapt to changing circumstances."

"7. The healthy submissive is playful."

"8. The healthy submissive has no more than the usual cultural conflicts about her body, and its goodness and beauty."

"9. The healthy submissive takes pride in her accomplishments."

"10. The healthy submissive accepts herself as she is, knowing that while her culture values independence and self sufficiency, she has strong dependency needs and that there is no inherent "wrongness" about those needs."

"11. The healthy submissive seeks nourishing relationships."

"12. The healthy submissive, in accepting herself 'as is' is tolerant of others. But neither will she allow anyone to tell her what her truth should be."

"13. The healthy submissive has a reasonable self concept, aware of her difficulties as well as her strengths.

"14. The healthy submissive hungers to be the object of an intense and penetrating understanding. When her nature is understood and she is held in a loving and firm frame, her devotion is almost limitless. The healthy submissive has an enormous capacity for devotion, from which springs her service."


4. What makes a woman submissive?

In order to evaluate and care for the physical and psychological wellbeing of a submissive well, it is important to reflect on possible motivations and reasons why a woman might be or might have become a submissive.  According to the concept of "Internal Enslavement", becoming submissive is a combination of nature and nurture, biology and environment, like any other way of human development. Various temperaments already show in early infancy and are well covered in research and literature. For example, there are noticeable differences of sleep regularity of babies. Responsiveness is different in individual childs, for example some infants "will find novelty and intense stimulation aversive, and will withdraw or become irritable when presented with those." (Yaldahtovh)

"The sum total of these innate, biologically founded responses make up temperament. It is easy to see what people mean by an "easy" baby: one who sleeps, eats, and eliminates regularly and predictably; one who has a moderate response to stimulation, neither withdrawing nor reacting intensely; one who is drawn easily into social exchanges, and provides pleasurable reinforcement of socialization with their caregivers, one who is easily "read" and easily comforted, one who accepts change without undue distress." (Yaldahtovh). Yaldahtovh's hypothesis is, that the social responsiveness is a biologically grounded trait in submissives that already manifested in early childhood. A baby "that will search the environment for a human face; who will be attuned to, and very responsive to the human voice; who will preferentially and selectively attend to, and process, human interaction" (Yaldahtovh) might be predisposed for becoming a submissive later.  As a little girl or boy this child will be exquisitely sensitive to criticism and correction, to disapproval, to praise. Rather than requiring a raised voice to correct, a raised eyebrow will often do. Depending on the experiences with certain behavior during childhood a submissive behavior might be conditioned in a person with such a biological disposition, or it might be unlearned.

Yaldahtovh writes further: "As children do, she requires the adults in her life to validate her perceptions when appropriate." It is not uncommon that some submissives desperately need and seek this validation in a D/s relationship when they are adults. It also makes clear that submissives who are usually sensitive with their "social antennas" and empathical might easily feel not validated and said if not treated according to their nature. This now closes the circle to the "Healthy Submissive". How can "unhealthyness" enter the door to a submissive's psychological world, we wonder?


5. Service-orientation and protection

"The submissive female learns to scan the social environment for signs of trouble, seeks to "fix" the trouble, and all too often, believes herself to be the cause of the trouble. If someone important is tired, the submissive has exhausted them. If someone important is angry, the submissive must have angered them. If someone important is disappointed, the submissive must have failed them." (Yaldahtovh). As said, this is mostly a matter of nature and nurture, such perceptions can be conditioned by reaction of family and other social environment and they can be unconditioned as well.

Now, what would be healthy for the submissive? According to Yaldatovh, the "submissive trait of interpersonal sensitivity in its highest expression is when the submissive accurately registers interpersonal nuance, and responds to it with a minimum of self-referral, recognizing that other's emotional states may have nothing to do with the submissive herself." The most important words here are  "Minimum of self referral", I think.  Is this "typically submissive"? Is this the key to the door that opens up towards unhealthyness? Yaldatovh adds: "Because of her intense awareness of interpersonal nuance, she is highly sensitive to both criticism and praise. When criticized, she is likely to feel intense shame; when praised, intense pleasure. Since the shame feels so bad, and the praise so pleasurable, she becomes a people-pleaser. [... She] bases her self assessment (am I good or bad?) on factors outside herself. The female submissive defines herself based on what others tell her she is."

I think it is very important for a Dominant to be aware of this "natural tendency" of a submissive if He/she wants to help the sub to become and stay healthy. They basically need protection from possible negative outcome of one of their typically submissive traits - the service orientation, their external locus of control.  There is also the question if the Dom thinks He/She can deal with such behavior and perceptions of the submissive. And yes, it might cost energies to deal with such nature of Your partner.

Wake up. oh Dominant who thinks that Dominance is easy and allows a comfortable life with a servant at Your feet. You have a responsibility in ensuring and protecting the health of Your submissive.

--------
This essay is based on http://www.enslavement.org.uk/yld-healthy


Sunday, May 19, 2013

Confidence - Where I am Led - Part 30 (by Julala)

I am generally considered a confident person.  Through my life people have said to me "I wish I had your confidence".  I can stand in front of a room of important strangers and happily speak to them.  I have stood on a stage in front of 100's (and an audience of one) and sung for them.  Walked into an interview knowing I will get the job.  Stood naked in front of my Master and felt beautiful.

I'm going to tell you a secret.......

Much of time...I too....feel terrified.  

When I do something that requires confidence my heart will race, I may feel physically sick, I may indeed tremble or even stop breathing altogether.  But you will likely never know.  And when I have done this thing that required my belief in doing it....I will feel elated.  And next time....I will be a little less terrified.  For me it is all about having a go and seeing what happens.  Perhaps one of the keys to confidence is knowing how to fail gracefully (I'll let you know if I ever figure out how to do that).

Yes I am confident....but it doesn't take much to rip my confidence from me and leave me feeling afraid and thinking badly of myself.  This is the truth, however well I hide it.  Yes I care what others think of me, yes I fear failure, yes I can feel self-conscious and embarrassed and low.  I am human.

“You wouldn't worry so much about what others think of you if you realized how seldom they do.” 
― Eleanor Roosevelt

In D/s one often assumes stereo-typically that confidence be a vital component of a Dominant and often lacking in a submissive.  But experience tells us that this is usually just a stereotype.  Is it realistic to assume that a Dominant can be confident about everything? Or could it be about how he presents him/her self even when not confident about something.   That he/she can simply remain calm, be in control of their fears and be able to make a decision anyway.

Would over-confidence....be where the line into arrogance lays? Where is that line? Perhaps we all have a different place for that line. What one persons sees as confidence, another will see as arrogance.

I have met many Dominants that exude confidence and some that do not....It is my observation that a Dominant without confidence (or in contrast too much confidence aka arrogance) does not appear to keep hold of submissives for very long in a relationship....and within the community does not seem to stay very long.  Would it be fair to say then, that a general level of confidence IS a requirement in a Dom/me for most submissives?  If a Dom/me can't position themselves with confidence are they going to take more knocks to their fragile ego and recline to the comfort of their vanilla existence (at least for a while before trying again).

I have met many submissive that have much confidence and many that do not.  I do not think it is  submissiveness that makes them less confident and I don't think it is their lack of confidence that dictates that they be submissive, although perhaps the opposite can be true at times i.e. an individual's confidence allowed them to be submissive or being submissive made them more confident.  I have heard many Dominants express their desire for a confident submissive.  I would imagine it takes a Dominant with confidence to own a confident submissive.  

Confidence

Certain aspects of SecondLife (and online chatrooms) allow for confidence building.  Being able to look how you would like, present yourself in a manner that you perhaps are not able in real life.  Be a man in a woman's body or a woman in a man's body.  Be a diva, a hero, a beauty, a warrior.  Is this sustainable and is it ever transferable?  Can someone build their confidence in Secondlife and as a result become more confident in real life?  Actually, I have seen this happen and I have also heard of virtual world experiences being used as authentic tools in "therapy" in various supervised and prescribed ways.  It is known that how we present our avatar can affect the way we behave and vice versa (see Proteus Effect).

We sometimes see a certain type of Psuedo-dominant that will choose a submissive of low confidence and work on building their own confidence by keeping the submissive down.  Knocking them in public, restricting access to friends, changing their look and wardrobe to reduce the submissives confidence, telling them they are worthless and useless and a failure.  This type of behaviour has no place in D/s.  In my opinion, this is neither confidence nor Dominance and usually indicates a low self-esteem on the part of the "Dominant".  However, it appears to be a certain type of person that would allow this type of behaviour to be used against them and as Eleanor Roosevelt once said, “No one can make you feel inferior without your consent”. 

So, how does one build their own confidence?  or build confidence in others?  THIS is what I would like to hear about in Monday's discussion.  What ways have you found to overcome your fears and walk forwards with confidence.  Have you made a confidence journey?  From high to low confidence or from low to high confidence?  What helped?  What didn't?  Do you have a mantra? Exercises to help build belief in yourself?  Has your Dominant or Your submissive helped with building your confidence?  Please do bring your experiences on Monday to share with others.

“Man often becomes what he believes himself to be. If I keep on saying to myself that I cannot do a certain thing, it is possible that I may end by really becoming incapable of doing it. On the contrary, if I have the belief that I can do it, I shall surely acquire the capacity to do it even if I may not have it at the beginning.” 
― Mahatma Gandhi

“If you think you are beaten, you are;
If you think you dare not, you don't.
If you'd like to win, but think you can't
It's almost a cinch you won't.
If you think you'll lose, you've lost,
For out in the world we find
Success being with a fellow's will;
It's all in the state of mind. 
If you think you're outclassed, you are:
You've got to think high to rise.
You've got to be sure of yourself before
You can ever win a prize.
Life's battles don't always go
To the stronger or faster man,
But soon or late the man who wins
Is the one who thinks he can.”
― Walter D. Wintle

These Monday discussions are loosely using the service exploration workbook "Where I am Led" by Christina Parker as a point of reference. You do not need to have read or even seen the book to fully participate in the discussion.

Everyone welcome. Please do join us on Monday (20th May) at 12pm SLT at the Temple of Discussion on Respect sim. Discussion is voice led but text also very welcome.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

What turns you on when the mind vies for control (and fails) (by Estos)

Julala's post on orgasm denial on 8th May, was, like many of her posts, hugely stimulating.  I say 'many' from a very personal perspective, it is probably fair to say that they all are, but for me, some I just don't get. *shrugs*

You can find her post here:
http://ds-academy.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/orgasm-control-now-heres-ideaby-julala.html

I watched each of those videos (some of them more than once) and found I had a strong reaction to some of them.  Some I would laugh with, some I would snigger, most I would smile.  They were, for me, a struggle that I myself experience, and wish to experience with others.  It is the obvious struggle between the mind (reading the story) and the body (being stimulated) played out not just in how much the woman will indulge herself, but in her reaction to that indulgence.

A good poem can be read, in fact, one knows it should be read, over and over again.  Each time you uncover a new way the words resonate in you.  So it is with these videos, except for one thing, these  scenes were not edited, they weren't re-positioned to get the 'right' effect. 

What is it about these women, resisting their bodies, that has the effect of a poem on me?

Does it have that effect on you?


Sunday, May 12, 2013

Loyalty - Where I am Led - Part 29 (by Julala)


What is loyalty?

The oxford dictionary defines "loyal" as:

"giving or showing firm and constant support or allegiance to a person or institution"

We often talk of loyalty as an essential requirement of the D/s relationship.  Actually, most require it of any long term partner, friend of member of the family.  We put value in loyalty.  We prize it even in our dogs.....hell even the supermarkets reward us for loyalty.

I often sit in discussions within our D/s community and often hear people state that they "must have loyalty" from their relationship.  I often wonder what they really mean by that.  I assume they mean that they want their partner to stick with them through good times and bad, support them through dark times, and forgive their mistakes.  To be faithful (within agreed terms) and to never let them down.  Never betray them.  Each valid needs or wants from a partner/lover/friend/Master/Dominant/submissive/slave.

But loyalty can be misplaced.  And loyalty can be restrictive or damaging.  Loyalty can false and loyalty can be a disguise.  Loyalty can be dangerous.

We've heard from some that a slave must always be loyal no matter what.  Never question, never waiver.  Loyal to the end.  Is this just a statement from the fantasists?  Should loyalty ever be without question?  

"For some people, loyalty must be blind and without the slightest word of criticism or dissent. I am terrified by the true believer- One who is deeply, sometimes fanatically devoted to a cause, organization, or person. I can't fathom how a person isn't able to allow questioning or dissent in any situation. Blind loyalty is dangerous and empty."
Diana Rodriguez



Abraham Lincoln once said: "Be with a leader when he is right, stay with him when he is still right, but, leave him when he is wrong."

And yet, we all know how it can feel when we are let down by someone we thought was a loyal partner, friend or lover.  How sickening it can feel to be betrayed.  It hurts.  So where do we draw the line?

The most saddening loyalty to see is when someone leaves...they die or disappear.  A person left behind may seek a pause in time by remaining loyal to a dream that is gone.  Never finding happiness with another person is somehow seen as a beautiful loyalty to the person they lost.  This gives comfort to some.  But is it a beautiful  loyalty or an unresolved grief that will dictate their loneliness for the rest of their lives?


When is it time to put aside our loyalty?  and does this then make us disloyal or dishonourable?  Which is the greater crime? Staying loyal when it is misplaced or knowing when to turn your back on someone and end your loyalty to them?  That kind of decision can tear a person up inside - loyalty can indeed be a bugger.

For some, loyalty is for the fools.
“My dear boy, the people who only love once in their lives are really the shallow people. What they call their loyalty, and their fidelity, I call either the lethargy of custom or their lack of imagination. Faithfulness is to the emotional life what consistency is to the life of the intellect—simply a confession of failures.” 
― Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray

At the discussion on Monday I will present some scenarios with great moral dilemma over loyalty and we will discuss them. There will be hard questions that some may not even wish to answer in their own minds, let alone said out loud.  I challenge you to come and join in.

These Monday discussions are loosely using the service exploration workbook "Where I am Led" by Christina Parker as a point of reference. You do not need to have read or even seen the book to fully participate in the discussion.

Everyone welcome. Please do join us on Monday (13th May) at 12pm SLT at the Temple of Discussion on Respect sim. Discussion is voice led but text also very welcome.

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Sorry....wut?

 *giggles*

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Shadow Suspension by STELARC & Havve Fjell


For anyone with a liking for suspension and/or piercing this may be of interest:

Shadow suspension was a collaboration with havve fjell for the dallas suscon 2013, organised by allen falkner. It was held at the lakewood theatre, dallas on the 30 march. 6 bodies, 3 males and 3 females, were suspended horizontally face-up in a hexagonal configuration. The body structure was spun, whilst winched up and lowered down and the sounds amplified. An aesthetic surveillance system of cameras positioned above, below and a hand-held camera enabled streaming of the performance from a multiplicity of viewpoints. The duration of the suspension itself was 23 minutes.

Some amazing photos on the website: http://stelarc.org/?catID=20342



Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Orgasm Control? Now here's an idea......(by Julala)

In his latest project, Hysterical Literature, photographer Clayton Cubitt takes a beautiful woman, places her at a table in front of a black backdrop and gets her to read from her favorite book while an unseen accomplice below the table attempts to bring the woman to orgasm with a vibrator. The results are an intimate, sexy experience that captures a beauty rarely found in most modern pornography.

















http://www.criminalwisdom.com/hysterical-literature-the-orgasm-as-art/



Sunday, May 5, 2013

Grace and Elegance - Where I am Led - part 28 (by Julala)

hmm...grace and elegance...is this a misnomer for qualities seen within D/s and BDSM?

Where does grace and elegance fit?

When we think of BDSM one might conjure images of bruises, sweaty unkempt hair, running makeup, tears, rather un-elegant positions, bulging skin over tight ropes, saliva running from a gagged mouth, snot running from a nose, gaping orifices, root vegetables and foreign objects placed where they weren't indented, humiliation, degradation, and pain.  One only has to do a quick Google search for BDSM images to see plenty of these things.  Where lies the elegance and grace?


When we experience or view sex within this dynamic one might see a preference for the "inner slut" to surface in favour of a graceful little bird.  Does a Dominant wish there to be grace and elegance in the bedroom? or wanton desire and a dirty little girl/boy?

And yet.....throughout D/s....grace and elegance is often revered,  trained, and encouraged.  Whatever your "bent" in this lifestyle there can always be room for grace and elegance although it may be found far from the bedroom or play room.

The most obvious place where grace and elegance might be found is in a submissive's service and manner towards their Dominant.  I have heard this most from those living in a D/s or M/s relationship and it is the style to which I am most accustomed.  Simplicities such as walking, sitting, kneeling, moving with poise and care.  Taking care with even the simplest of tasks....even to the way one hands Master's lunch to Him....with grace and purpose.  Never with complacency or absent-mindedness.  When speaking with Master, with guests, when attending an event, even when a relationship is at a distance or in a virtual world it is entirely possible to serve and behave with elegance and grace if that is the requirement.

I was recently recommended a book to read called "Living M/s" by Dan and Dawn Williams.  Flipping through the Kindle pages, there were one or points in there that, for me, related to grace and elegance rather well, so I shall share a small piece or two:

"...When I make our bed every morning, I don't just straighten the covers.  Instead I think about my Master and how this pleases him.  I remember his command that I make the bed in the morning, and I pay attention to the details of what I am doing.  As I serve his coffee, I am not a wife pouring her husband's coffee; I'm a slave who has the honor of serving her Master.  I make his coffee as he likes it; then, with intention, I serve his coffee, mindful of my demeanor and tone.  Do I just hand him his coffee as I pass on the way to my computer? No.  I stop, wait for him to acknowledged me, look him in the eye, and bow my head to him as I place the cup on his desk.  When I take off his socks at night on put on/take of his boots, I stop talking, take a breath, calm the clatter in my head and concentrate on the experience of what I am doing.  I feel the texture of his socks or boots, the energy of our connection, the heat of his skin, and the sound of our breathing; everything else stops and that moment becomes primary."
Dawn Williams, Living M/s 

In our communities too, there is plenty of room for showing grace and elegance.  And not just the submissives.....a Dominant can show grace and elegance too....in their treatment of others.

"...Fortunately for me...observers stifled their laughter, gently removed the crop from my hand, and offered to help me by mentoring me.  They could have mocked me, reacted with sarcasm, or tried to score "cool points" by deriding my skill (of lack thereof).  Instead they understood they had an opportunity to lead and teach, and they acted responsibly to help bring out the best in someone new.  When you see someone screw up, make a mistake, or imply a level of expertise they don't possess, you'll have that opportunity.  Will you turn on them, slam the door, and practice your witticism by making sarcastic jokes about (or, worse, to) the "stupid newbie"?  Or will you laugh with them and say: "I remember doing it that way, and it didn't work out well.  May I make a few suggestions?".....................Regarding group gossip, politics, and assholes....they'll always be with us.  What you can do is NOT engage in such behavior.  Ever.  As Master of a slave, not only lead by example but do not allow them to engage in that behavior either."
Dan Williams, Living M/s

Grace and elegance can be found in many places in D/s and BDSM....even where it may be difficult to see on the surface it can be found integral to many different aspects and elements of a relationship.   Where is it in yours?  Please do come along to the discussion on Monday and share your thoughts and experiences.


These Monday discussions are loosely using the service exploration workbook "Where I am Led" by Christina Parker as a point of reference. You do not need to have read or even seen the book to fully participate in the discussion.

Everyone welcome. Please do join us on Monday (6th May) at 12pm SLT at the Temple of Discussion on Respect sim. Discussion is voice led but text also very welcome.