Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Eyes on the RL scene: Consent Counts campaign of the NSCF (by Mirjam)

The origin and goal of "Consent Counts" campaign, led by the NCSF

"In 2007, NCSF (National Coalition for Sexual Freedom) organized a leather leadership roundtable at the Creating Change conference to discuss the goals of the BDSM-Leather-Fetish communities. The number one priority was determined to be DECRIMINALIZATION OF BDSM. A subsequent town hall meeting was held at LLC to further discuss this goal and to establish an outline for a working plan for this 10-15 year project. This is a community-wide project, with participation by national groups as well as activists to help determine the strategy and plan to accomplish this goal."
(Judy Guerin, NCSF, Consent Counts project director)


Program description 

"The Consent Counts project involves the BDSM communities in a nationwide education and activism program coordinated and led by the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. This multifaceted campaign includes a comprehensive is analysis of current laws and court decisions, the development of legal arguments for changing the laws, participating in court cases, and ultimately, through lobbying, education and grass-roots activism, changing state laws and the way the public and the courts view BDSM. An important element of the project also includes an Educational Outreach Program (EOP) to educate our own communities of the current state of the law, of the effort NCSF is undertaking and to involve them in our strategic planning process and development of “best practices” by which we can protect ourselves and facilitate change."
(source: https://ncsfreedom.org/key-programs/consent-counts/consent-counts.html)



Mission statement

"Mission: To decriminalize consensual BDSM (Bondage, Discipline, Dominance/submission, sadomasochism) in U.S. law by ensuring that consent will be recognized as a defense to criminal charges brought under assault laws and other statutes.

Unlike most other sexual issues (rape, for example), BDSM activities—a “scene”, a dungeon party, a Dominant/submissive or Master/slave relationship—can result in a criminal prosecution and conviction even where the activity is entirely consensual. It’s important to remember that most BDSM activities are treated as violence and not sex. This is not speculation; in 2010, NCSF’s incident response help line received 204 requests for help concerning criminal prosecutions.

NCSF’s research of cases throughout the United States revealed that not a single appellate court decision has allowed consent as a defense to a BDSM-based criminal prosecution for assault, sexual abuse, etc. Even where a state law allows the consent defense in cases that do not involve “serious bodily injury,” appellate courts have ruled that the use of nipple clamps or hot wax produces “serious bodily injury”.

The realization that our communities are at risk of criminal prosecution led to the launch of the “Consent Counts” initiative in 2006 at a Leather Leadership Roundtable at NGLTF’s Creating Change. At this Roundtable and one held subsequently at the Leather Leadership Conference, decriminalization of consensual BDSM was determined to be the number one priority of the BDSM/Leather/Fetish communities. It was subsequently determined that NCSF would take a leadership and coordinating role. This is, with the related initiative to change the way BDSM is viewed by psychiatry in the DSM criteria, NCSF’s most important project.

Our “Consent Counts” initiative is multi-faceted. We have researched the statutes, court decisions and relevant law review articles in all 50 states, and the results of that research are available on the NCSF website. We are presenting programs and holding meetings with our communities across the country, to build understanding of the issues and to develop consensus on an effective approach to nationwide activism. A national discussion guide has been created to facilitate local discussions to assist in the drafting of a community-wide statement on consent at LLC at Seattle 2013 with the goal of decriminalization and to promote local and national activism. This aspect of our initiative also includes an EOP focused on Frequently Asked Questions about the criminal law issues and on Best Practices by which individuals and groups can reduce the likelihood of prosecution and—equally important—enable us to argue more effectively that what we do is mutually pleasurable erotic activity (not violence) and that care is taken to ensure consensuality and avoid excessive stimulation or unintended harm. In addition, NCSF has published primers for both alleged victims and for those accused of consent violations.

The activism aspect of “Consent Counts” will be equally multifaceted. We have already begun reaching out to law enforcement, to legislators and to educators. In the coming year, we will be presenting continuing legal education (CLE) programs to lawyers, working with bar associations and law student groups, and participating selectively with “friend of the court” briefs in legal cases. Further down the road is the development of grass roots activism to change state laws and law enforcement practices.

In all of this, we need your help. You can report BDSM-related criminal investigations and prosecutions to NCSF. Your local groups can host “Consent Counts” presentations and discussions on activism strategies and on community practices that can help avoid criminal problems. As we go forward, we are seeking volunteers for various forms of activism and educational outreach. And, of course, your continuing donations to the NCSF Foundation (tax-deductible) and NCSF are essential for making this project effective.

(source: https://ncsfreedom.org/who-we-are/about-ncsf/item/550.html)








5 comments:

Julala said...

is all this relevant to those outside of the US? Terms like "National campaign" and "US law" leads me to think not? To be honest I'm not even sure how the law views things over here in the UK with regards to BDSM, etc. Is there a reference site for EU/ Aus/etc on this sort of thing too?

Julala said...

partly answering my own question - this may be of interest to British peeps:

Spanner Trust

Mirjam Munro said...

Does this help?

" The Spanner case in England demonstrates the point, where participants in a consensual mutual BDSM play party were arrested. At all stages, the national and European Court ruled against them on the basis that a person under English law may not give consent to anything more than minor injury. Interested people may think that private mutual activities should not be the subject of law as a matter of public policy, a view which has some legal backing in the United States from the case of Lawrence v. Texas where it was effectively ruled that the state lacked the power to declare an activity illegal purely on the basis of moral opinion.

The March 5th 2007 conviction of Glenn Marcus on counts of sex trafficking & forced labor renewed much debate on this issue. Likewise in April 2007, two UK men were convicted of false imprisonment in a case where a third party who had been treated like a dog asserted the matter had not been consensual."
(source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_%28BDSM%29)

Julala said...

lol...thanks Mirjam....posted at the same time ;o)

Mirjam Munro said...

Ohhh i just saw You also put in a link to the Spanner case *grins*.

Anyway ... i think main thing is that we get aware that "Consent" in the context of BDSM is not preventing all possible legal issues in the context of bdsm related activities. it becomes really tricky, for example, when the question is asked if giving of "informed consent" is possible for a submissive in the middle of a scene when he/she might be in subspace. or ask about the responsibilities ... are there situations where the Dominant has legally grounded responsibilities, while the submissive has ethical responsibilities? and what the heck about M/s contracts and stuff that are not legally binding? I am curious what will come out of the Consent Counts initiative of the NCSF.